अब आप न्यूज्ड हिंदी में पढ़ सकते हैं। यहाँ क्लिक करें
cyfy
Home » IANS » CPI-M backed by Pawar and CPI against ‘one nation, one election’

CPI-M backed by Pawar and CPI against ‘one nation, one election’

by
Published on :

New Delhi, June 19 (IANS) The CPI-M on Wednesday claimed to have support from Sharad Pawar, President Nationalist Congress Party, and CPI against the ‘one nation, one election’ proposal. The party termed it “fundamentally anti-federal, anti-democratic” and striking at the root of the parliamentary democratic system.

CPI-M General Secretary Sitaram Yechury said Pawar is in agreement with him on the issues in connection with holding the Lok Sabha and state assembly elections together.

“This requires very serious constitutional amendment. And, under the present Constitutional framework, it is not possible. Sharad Pawar and the CPI agree with us on the same”, said Yechury while interacting with media.

In a note submitted at an all-party meeting here, Yechury opined that such an electoral excercise would require tampering with the constitutional scheme of accountability of the government to the legislature.

“Apart from the technical issues involved in the holding the simultaneous elections to Parliament and state assemblies, our opposition to this is based on the fact that it is fundamentally anti-federal, anti-democratic and strikes at the root of the parliamentary democratic system as ordained in the Constitution,” Yechury said.

He admitted that elections were indeed held simultaneously after India adopted a Constitution.

“However, elections to the state assemblies got detached from the general election due to the arbitrary misuse of Article 356 by the Central government. This process began with the dismissal of the Communist Ministry in Kerala in 1959.

“Holding the Lok Sabha and state assembly elections together would require tampering with the Constitutional scheme of accountability of the government to the legislature…

“Under the Constitution, if a government loses the confidence of the legislature either by being voted out on a no-confidence motion, or, losing a vote on a Money Bill, it is bound to resign. If no alternative government can be formed, the House is dissolved and a mid-term election held.

“There is no fixity of tenure enshrined in the Constitution either for the Lok Sabha or for the state legislatures.

“Any attempt to prolong the life of the Lok Sabha or legislature will not only be unconstitutional but also anti-democratic. It is the will of the people through their elected representatives that must prevail,” Yechury said.

The CPI-M leader debunked the various suggestions to hold simultaneous elections, calling one of them “outrageous” and an attempt to bring an executive Presidency through the back door.

“India is a vast country with myriad diversities and only a federal set-up can sustain political democracy. Having elections in states at different times is one aspect of the federal system,” he said.

–mr/ss/prs

(This story has not been edited by Newsd staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
(For more latest news and updates Like us on Facebook, Follow us on Twitter. Download our mobile app )

You May Like

Latests Posts

Editor's Choice

Trending