अब आप न्यूज्ड हिंदी में पढ़ सकते हैं। यहाँ क्लिक करें
Home » Politics » Why Has Removing Section 40 of Waqf Act Become So Controversial?

Why Has Removing Section 40 of Waqf Act Become So Controversial?

The Lok Sabha approved the Waqf Amendment Bill 2025, introducing reforms to property management, including the removal of Section 40, giving Waqf Boards significant authority over property disputes.

By Tarique Anwer
Published on :
Waqf Act

Waqf Act: The Indian government has introduced significant reforms to the country’s Waqf property management system through the Waqf Amendment Bill 2025, which was presented in the Lok Sabha this Wednesday. The proposed changes have sparked intense political debate, particularly regarding the removal of a key provision that currently gives Waqf Boards substantial authority over property disputes.

The controversy is the basically about the complete scraping off of Section 40 from the existing Waqf Act. This section currently empowers Waqf Boards to independently determine whether disputed properties qualify as Waqf properties.

April 2025 Financial Changes: Updates on Income Tax, Credit Cards, Mutual Funds &More

During parliamentary discussions, Trinamool Congress MP Kalyan Banerjee strongly criticized this change, stating: “If Section 40 is deleted, the Waqf Board will be a teethless doll… a doll only. If this section is deleted then there is no necessity to keep the Waqf Board itself.” Reported Business Standard

Waqf Act: Current Powers Under Section 40

The existing Section 40 grants Waqf Boards several important authorities. The boards can initiate investigations into any property they suspect might be Waqf property. When disputes arise about a property’s classification, the board conducts inquiries and makes binding decisions that can only be overturned by specialized Waqf Tribunals, not by regular government authorities.

The provision also allows Waqf Boards to examine properties registered under other trust laws. If they determine such properties should be classified as Waqf properties, they can require the current trustees to either re-register the property under Waqf laws or present arguments against doing so. The board’s final decision on these matters stands unless modified by the Waqf Tribunal.

Impact of the Proposed Changes

The amendment’s removal of Section 40 would fundamentally alter how Waqf properties are identified and managed. Without this provision, the Waqf Boards would lose their autonomous decision-making power regarding property classifications. This has raised concerns among some community representatives who view the change as weakening an important institution for Muslim property management.

Delhi Woman Loses ₹47 Lakh in WhatsApp KYC Scam: Ways to Stay Safe

Supporters of the amendment argue it will bring more transparency and oversight to Waqf property administration. However, critics maintain that eliminating the board’s independent authority could make the system more vulnerable to political interference and bureaucratic delays.

Ongoing Parliamentary Process and Future Implications

As the bill moves through the legislative process, further debates are expected in both houses of Parliament. The outcome will determine whether India’s Waqf property management system maintains its current structure or undergoes significant restructuring. Community leaders, legal experts, and political representatives continue to analyze how these changes might affect the thousands of Waqf properties across the country and the institutions that depend on them.

Related